DINARESGURUS.BLOGSPOT.COM_________ DINARESGURUS.BLOGSPOT.COM__________________

Saturday, December 17, 2016

MNT GOAT UPDATE, 17 DEC


December 17, 2016 Mnt Goat News Brief
 
Hi Everyone,
 
I bring you much news today. I do not want to put a date on the event of the RV. But I am leaning more and more towards Iraq not taking any action on the “project to delete the zeros” and waiting until the new president Trump is sworn into office. This is still within the timeframe of “EARLY 2017”. Why do I say this?
 
Okay so for all you so called “intel gurus”  I will explain so don’t ever accuse me of not justifying my statements.
 
I will say I do not have any hard evidence and this and this is just my opinion. I feel this way because I firmly believe that what I have already seen from this current administration (with all the corruption involved in the USA government in allowing early exchanges of the Iraqi dinar to ONLY the elite politicians and family members), that it is these kind of mistakes in foreign policy by the USA that have held Iraq back in the past


And will continue as long as they are in power.
 
But this all changes on January 20th, 2017. I am NOT predicting an RV on Jan 20th? Absolutely NOT!. But I am saying is not to expect the launching of the lower denominations anytime soon at least before this period. Then we have to wait and see just how the Trump administration will change the policy with Iraq. Personally I think there will be some huge changes as the dust settles from the transition.
 
Did I just say the current Obama administration has been holding back the rollout of the Iraqi dinar to international levels? Yes and No, since it is not easy to make such statements without looking at all the FACTS.
 
So on one hand YES because they indirectly have had the ability to influence what happened in Iraq and did nothing to prevent the economic disaster.
 
With the pullout of the US armed forces in Dec 2011 and the “declared” sovereignty in June of 2013, the current US administration washed their hands of Iraqi affairs. Now they could justify putting blame on Iraq and not have to take responsibility anymore.
 
However with continued support of the corrupt prime minister Nori al-Maliki administration, one must ask what was really going on. Is this not direct influence anyhow? I know for a fact that the intelligence from Iraq was pouring in to the Whitehouse.  ISIS was allowed to infiltrate and Maliki was allowed to hold back much needed legislation. The sectarianism continued and real change did not begin to happen until Maliki was out of office.
 
So we can see that directly, without Iraq being economically ready, there was a continuance to postpone the “project to delete the zeros” in 2013 then again in 2015 and this all made real sense on the surface. But if you really look at the all the FACTS you can see the reasons for the postponements are intentional due to the situation in Iraq. But who is causing these situations? You have to keep asking what come first – the chicken or the egg…lol…lol…
 
But many will claim that is was also the economic conditions due to the drop in oil prices that was also the source of the problems. Really? Do you really believe this? Did you ever hear of saving for a rainy day? Thank God that Dr Shabibi did build up the reserves as he did to nearly 90 billion US dollars. But this too is not enough.
 
Yes this too had some justification but if you have been reading all the articles, then you too can see that billions and billions of oil revenues (when oil was over $100/barrel) was stolen, waisted or left the country (some gone to Iran to support the buildup of ISIS).
 
This money could have rebuilt the country of Iraq three times over. It could have been spent to built up and reinforce their military infrastructure, re-establish electricity, running water, build homes, shopping centers and hospitals. But instead what does Iraq have to show for these “golden” years of robust oil revenues?
 
There was absolutely no need to experience what Iraq has gone through over these last 8 years of the Maliki administration.
 
But why did this all occur this way?
Was it due to the leadership both in Iraq and the USA? Do you get the connection now?  You can’t disconnect the two since there lays a sense of responsibility when you invade, conquer and then occupy a country, as the USA did do.  
 
So please don’t buy into the rhetoric and all the nonsense that the USA government is innocent of what has recently happened in Iraq just because in 2013 they became a “sovereign nation” (which in itself is not even true). The USA is as much to blame as Iraq itself. When the president elect for USA states that “the US govt created ISIS” this is exactly what he means. Do you get it now?  
 
Oh – but they will claim Iraq is a sovereign country and they had complete control over their own destiny. Really? Then where is their currency if they are so sovereign? Why is their economy still under a “closed sanctioned economy” from the rest of the global markets? Seems Iraq is sovereign only when the USA does not want to take responsibility for what is going on inside Iraq.
 
So knowing all this, this brings us right back to the my main question – Why has the USA current administration allowed the elitist of the govt to exchange Iraq dinar already when Iraq itself has not experienced the benefits of its own currency?  
 
What else is in the news……?

And will continue as long as they are in power.
 
But this all changes on January 20th, 2017. I am NOT predicting an RV on Jan 20th? Absolutely NOT!. But I am saying is not to expect the launching of the lower denominations anytime soon at least before this period. Then we have to wait and see just how the Trump administration will change the policy with Iraq. Personally I think there will be some huge changes as the dust settles from the transition.
 
Did I just say the current Obama administration has been holding back the rollout of the Iraqi dinar to international levels? Yes and No, since it is not easy to make such statements without looking at all the FACTS.
 
So on one hand YES because they indirectly have had the ability to influence what happened in Iraq and did nothing to prevent the economic disaster.
 
With the pullout of the US armed forces in Dec 2011 and the “declared” sovereignty in June of 2013, the current US administration washed their hands of Iraqi affairs. Now they could justify putting blame on Iraq and not have to take responsibility anymore.
 
However with continued support of the corrupt prime minister Nori al-Maliki administration, one must ask what was really going on. Is this not direct influence anyhow? I know for a fact that the intelligence from Iraq was pouring in to the Whitehouse.  ISIS was allowed to infiltrate and Maliki was allowed to hold back much needed legislation. The sectarianism continued and real change did not begin to happen until Maliki was out of office.
 
So we can see that directly, without Iraq being economically ready, there was a continuance to postpone the “project to delete the zeros” in 2013 then again in 2015 and this all made real sense on the surface. But if you really look at the all the FACTS you can see the reasons for the postponements are intentional due to the situation in Iraq. But who is causing these situations? You have to keep asking what come first – the chicken or the egg…lol…lol…
 
But many will claim that is was also the economic conditions due to the drop in oil prices that was also the source of the problems. Really? Do you really believe this? Did you ever hear of saving for a rainy day? Thank God that Dr Shabibi did build up the reserves as he did to nearly 90 billion US dollars. But this too is not enough.
 
Yes this too had some justification but if you have been reading all the articles, then you too can see that billions and billions of oil revenues (when oil was over $100/barrel) was stolen, waisted or left the country (some gone to Iran to support the buildup of ISIS).
 
This money could have rebuilt the country of Iraq three times over. It could have been spent to built up and reinforce their military infrastructure, re-establish electricity, running water, build homes, shopping centers and hospitals. But instead what does Iraq have to show for these “golden” years of robust oil revenues?
 
There was absolutely no need to experience what Iraq has gone through over these last 8 years of the Maliki administration.
 
But why did this all occur this way?
Was it due to the leadership both in Iraq and the USA? Do you get the connection now?  You can’t disconnect the two since there lays a sense of responsibility when you invade, conquer and then occupy a country, as the USA did do.  
 
So please don’t buy into the rhetoric and all the nonsense that the USA government is innocent of what has recently happened in Iraq just because in 2013 they became a “sovereign nation” (which in itself is not even true). The USA is as much to blame as Iraq itself. When the president elect for USA states that “the US govt created ISIS” this is exactly what he means. Do you get it now?  
 
Oh – but they will claim Iraq is a sovereign country and they had complete control over their own destiny. Really? Then where is their currency if they are so sovereign? Why is their economy still under a “closed sanctioned economy” from the rest of the global markets? Seems Iraq is sovereign only when the USA does not want to take responsibility for what is going on inside Iraq.
 
So knowing all this, this brings us right back to the my main question – Why has the USA current administration allowed the elitist of the govt to exchange Iraq dinar already when Iraq itself has not experienced the benefits of its own currency?  
 
What else is in the news……?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.